I was reading Sophist’s latest addition to her case study and I wanted to share my thoughts on some of issues she brings up.
You mentioned that JNCQ has expressed some doubt concerning your Asperger’s diagnoses. I was wondering if this doubt could be stemming from the possibility that he perceives Asperger’s through the paradigm to the “ultra male brain”.
I bring this up because this relates to a discussion I had with a diagnosed aspie female I meet at an Asperger’s Society adult meet up group (let’s call her K). K was telling me she was beginning to have doubts about her diagnosis. Most of the other people in the group were not nearly as communicative as she was and presented far more obvious stereotypical traits (e.g. atypical speech patterns, difficulty making eye contact, etc).
I found this interesting since I have been grappling with some doubts myself. I have grown much more functional in public over the past couple of years and do not suffer from melt downs as badly as in the past. K then mentioned something that got me thinking. She told me that for much of her life she found she was much more comfortable in the company of men. Specifically she didn’t like being drawn into the politics of females in a work scenario. For example, female co-worker A would come into conflict with female co-worker B. Co-worker A would then try to get K to hate co-worker B as part of a campaign of social isolation against co-worker B. K has no interest in being part of this but finds the pressure distressful. This was intriguing to me in contrast with my personal experiences.
Although male, I have tended to present in some ways like a female with Asperger’s. For example, I would try to mimic the expressions of my peers, I didn’t like rough and tumble play, I spoke like the stereotypical “little professor”, and even my ADHD manifested more in the form of daydreaming as opposed to physical hyperactivity. Socialising has always been a challenge for me as it tends to be for all people with Asperger’s. The few regular interactions I had growing up, that I found personally fulfilling, were primarily with females. I have been wondering how I could reconcile the experiences of K and myself.
A female (with or without Asperger’s) in an all male group is as much of an outsider as a male in an all female group. I submit that an outsider is considered somewhat exempt from participation in the “politics” of the larger group. Since aspies tend to be either oblivious to or uninterested in the socio-political manoeuvring around them, any environment where they are essentially non-combatants would more comfortable. Also there may be a possibility that some of the atypical characteristics associated with aspies could be interpreted by members of their non-gender equivalent peers as quirks of the aspie’s gender. A male aspie with an obsession for Napoleonic history might be seen by his female peers as simply a “guy thing”.
I wonder if females (or perhaps anyone) with Asperger’s who have managed to find their coping mechanisms simply do not present as much on the surface as most men do.
This is just my lay opinion. I have not studied this topic in sufficient depth to be certain to my personal satisfaction. Please feel free to hit me through the internet with a rolled up newspaper if I am incredibly off base.
Postscript
Sorry if I want on a bit of a tangent at one point.

