Mon-Key wrote:I had a frontal lobe attack today, btw folks. Bye now.
What's a frontal lobe attack? :: envisions some strange brain things ::
Blandit wrote:I think it means that Mon-key was more coherent and structured today.But once the frontal-lobe attack ceases, she will be back the the staccato bullet speech where her brain runs much faster than her typing skills and the rest of us try to keep up with her thinking as we latch on and hold tight for dear life, while our hair sweeps back in the wind and the centrifugal force flattens our faces and makes our lips flap and AAaaahhhh!!!!
![]()
Am I correct? (either that, or vice-versa!)
ukenkerl wrote:Well, AS is acquired before 2!
Steve

Sophist wrote:ukenkerl wrote:Well, AS is acquired before 2!
Steve
If Dr. Casanova's postmortem findings can be used to infer ( shows much promise but still needs more study), then ASDs are "acquired" within the first ten weeks of foetal life. This is due to cortical cell division. All minicolumns and the pyramidal cells within them, as far as number count, are decided within the first ten weeks during gestation. And auties, at least those Dr. C has studied to date, have all had increased cell counts within the cortical minicolumns.
ukenkerl wrote:Sophist wrote:ukenkerl wrote:Well, AS is acquired before 2!
Steve
If Dr. Casanova's postmortem findings can be used to infer ( shows much promise but still needs more study), then ASDs are "acquired" within the first ten weeks of foetal life. This is due to cortical cell division. All minicolumns and the pyramidal cells within them, as far as number count, are decided within the first ten weeks during gestation. And auties, at least those Dr. C has studied to date, have all had increased cell counts within the cortical minicolumns.
I was just stating what the manual says. Before 2 could mean from inception, but it definately doesn't include 3.
And YEP! I always wanted to see my brain, but never more than now. You are almost certainly right about it being genetic, ESPECIALLY since it runs in families, etc... and so many are caucasion.
Steve

ukenkerl wrote:YEAH, I had a cat scan done only about 1.5 years ago! IRONICALLY is was STUPID! I had profuse bleeding, and the ONLY logical reason for the cat scan WOULD have been to determine if there was brain damage. Of course, IF such a thing happened, I would have been dead before they got to me. I wonder how long they keep that stuff.
Steve



Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest